Residential properties & Real estate Index - Ranking of Indian cities

All of us have wondered at some point the growth of certain cities in terms of appreciation in its real estates while others remaining constant or some going down. Magazines such as “India Today” etc carry out an annual issue highlighting such a trend and some of the newspapers also carry out such analysis.

A question is often asked – Do we have an authentic index of cities based on its movement of residential properties valuation?

Yes, we do have !

 

Its called RESIDEX prepared and managed by National Housing Bank(NHB). I didn’t know till a detailed presentation was made on this index in one of its Board meetings upon my joining and after detailed analysis, I am of the opinion that it’s certainly the best index in India of cities and it’s movement (upward or downward) from a base year and one of the best and most neutral Index when compared with similar such indexes internationally. Let me explain the genesis of this index, it’s constitution and then we will have a look at this index.

Keeping in view the prominence of housing and real estate as a major area for creation of both physical and financial assets and its contribution in overall National wealth, a need was felt for setting up of a mechanism, which could track the movement of prices in the residential housing segment.  National Housing Bank, at the behest of the Ministry of Finance, prepares such an index at the National level. A Technical Advisory Group (TAG)  comprising representatives from Ministry of Finance (MoF), Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Central Statistical Organisation (CSO), National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO), Labour Bureau, State Bank of India (SBI), Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. (HDFC) and ICICI Home fiancé ltd. Was constituted to guide and approve the Index before its release. The pilot study covered 5 cities viz. Bangalore, Bhopal, Delhi, Kolkata and Mumbai, for which index was constructed till the period 2005 taking 2001 as the Base Year. Based on the results of the pilot study and recommendations of TAG, NHB launched RESIDEX for tracking prices of residential properties in India, in July 2007.

On the recommendation of TAG, Base Year was shifted from 2001 to 2007 to make it as recent as possible so as to reflect changes in the housing prices more accurately. At the same time, 10 new cities were added taking the total number of cities covered to 15. Subsequently 5 cities were added from the quarter January-March, 2012 and 6 more cities were added from the quarter January-March, 2013. NHB RESIDEX now covers 26 cities.

NHB RESIDEX was released on half yearly basis uptil 2009. From quarter Jan-March, 2010 onwards, RESIDEX is being updated on quarterly basis. The Residex takes into account the price trends for residential properties in different locations and zones in each city. Data on the transactions are collected from diverse sources (14 Banks & 12 HFCs covering about 50-60000 transaction data & also market data from NCAER) and are classified, validated and applied to the model designed to give the representative Index for each city.  

Let’s now look at this index – I have arranged the cities in descending order based on the valuation of the residential property potential. The base year value in 2007 is kept at 100 and the present value (April-June 2013) shows its value as on date.

 

While Chennai, Bhopal, Mumbai, Pune & Faridabad are top five cities in its appreciation, Hyderabad, Kochi, Bengaluru, Jaipur & Surat are the cities with lowest appreciation in this list of 26 cities. Hyderabad & Kochi are the only two cities which have actually witnessed a decline in the real value when compared with 2007.

 Another emerging trend is the growing importance of mid-level cities such as Meerut, Faridabad, Bhubneshwar, Indore, Coimbatore etc. This also is due to growing purchasing power of middle class and enough savings for people to invest in residential properties. A welcome movement also has been proliferation of good quality modern multi-storey apartments in these cities.

How is the RESIDEX calculated

The index is being computed by using Price Relative Method (Modified Laspeyre’s Approach). Under this method price relatives are calculated only once (at the basic stratified unit) and the weighted average of these price relatives leads to the index at next level and so on.

PI (Laspeyre’s Modified):  ∑( Wo * P1/Po) * 100 

                                                           ∑ Wo                                                                          

In order to ensure a broad and representative Index, market segmentation has been done in the following manner:

I.           The selected city level market has been first segmented on the basis of the municipal administrative zones or property tax zones, based on the applicable zonal segmentation done by the city authorities.
ii.                  Thereafter, selection of locations has been done on the basis of their spatial distribution across the city. 
iii.          In each of the selected colony, both new and resale housing units have been included, including flatted and plotted developments, developed by various housing agencies, including public housing agencies, private developers, cooperatives and informal land assembly mechanisms.
iv.         Finally, to arrive at the representative basket, the following category of housing products have been covered:

• EWS and LIG housing, upto 2 rooms and covered area less than 45 sq. m. (<500 font="" ft.="" sq.="">
• MIG housing with 2 bedrooms and covered area between 45 and 90 sq. m. (500 – 1,000 sq. ft)
• HIG housing units with 3 bedrooms or more and covered area more than 90 sq. m. (>1,000 sq. ft.)

The construction of index follows a three-stage approach.

• In the first stage, the average price for all the three categories in the zone is arrived at by taking simple average of all the prices pertaining to that category in the zone. Thereafter a weighted average price is calculated for the Zone by taking transaction based weights for the 3 categories of Built-up -area. These transaction based weights are fixed since 2007 and were calculated on the basis of number of transactions received for three different categories in that year. The total of the weights is 1.
• In the second stage, the weighted average prices for the Zone is multiplied by the factor assigned to that Zone on the basis of Housing Stock or population of that city. The total of the factors assigned to various Zones in a city comes out to 100.
• In the third stage, the Zonal indices are calculated by taking the prices relatives of the current year and base year. City index is calculated by aggregating the zone level indices using area covered in different zones/housing stock during base year as weights.

The Residex is expected to bring greater uniformity and standardisation as well as greater transparency in the valuation of properties across the industry.

Uses of NHB RESIDEX  - The Index helps the general consumers and property buyers and borrowers in their decision-making by enabling comparisons over time and across cities and localities based on the emerging trends. The Residex also provides insights into the property market for the lending agencies in their credit evaluation and assessment of the value (present and potential) of the security against the loan. NHB RESIDEX can be a useful indicator for estimating the value of property to be financed and also for assessing the value of security cover on the outstanding loan. Builders and developers may also benefit from the index by assessing the demand scenario in a locality, and mapping the housing needs in different parts of the country. NHB RESIDEX may be useful to policy makers, banks, housing finance companies, builders, developers, investors and individuals. NHB RESIDEX is being well-received from all the corners of the industry e.g. banks, HFCs, Builders & Developers and Government (Economic Survey).

Growing acceptance of the RESIDEX

           NHB shares the RESIDEX with RBI, Banks and Housing Finance Companies for enabling them to initiate appropriate policy measure including formulation of business plans. NHB RESIDEX has been mentioned as the authentic and official Housing price Index for India in different publications e.g. a book on “The Price of Land – Acquisition, Conflict andConsequences by Sanjoy Chakravorthy”   has extensively used NHB-Residex to draw many conclusions.  As per this book, the Residex prices have been considered good estimates because they are based on real transactions.

          NHB plans to increase the number of cities further to cover all 63 JnNURM cities over a period of time. It also proposes to increase the frequency of Residex from quarterly to monthly basis. Further, to make it keep up with times, NHB plans to change the base year from 2007 to 2010 to make it more contemporary. NHB also plans to undertake various correlation studies (cause and effect) between the price trend in the cities and other parameters viz. demographic changes, housing loan portfolio, level of economic and commercial activities, investors versus end users market, State Housing Policies and their impact, changes in income and employment profile in the cities etc. which would be a crucial policy input for Urban planning.

Why is Rupee falling ? - understanding the dynamics of a bigger picture !

"The only time the Indian Rupee goes up is during a Toss."  

While it may seem as one of the latest whatsapp/text jokes, the serious implications of a depreciating Rupee (currency) are many. Has it all happened too suddenly? Does it mean that the country is in for some major trouble? Does it spell doom? Is it all Oil (POL) driven induced by the misuse of petrol? Is it because of continuous gold imports? What are the reasons for this sudden depreciation?

 The media, especially the e-media has gone hyper again highlighting the depreciation of Rupee (INR) for the last month or so and it was proving to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. It's almost hilarious how everybody became an expert on Rupee depreciation. I was particularly amused when I watched one evening, to my utter horror, actor John Abraham (with due regards) talking about Rupee depreciation and what should be done to control the rot! Another interesting dimension being gossiped these days is how the design of Rupee logo isn’t proper and Rupee will continue to suffer unless the design is changed!

My daughter asked me to explain the other day in very simple language, reasons for decline in Rupee value, the entire dynamics and what can be done immediately and in the medium and long term to stabilize the exchange rate. While some reasons to me were coming obvious, putting them in simple language by giving the bigger macro picture is what has prompted me to make an attempt now to examine this issue.

I will start by explaining few concepts very briefly:

Exchange rate: An exchange rate, between two currencies, is the rate at which one currency is exchanged for another. It used to be a fixed exchange rate system under Britton Woods (till late sixties), moving to adjustable peg system (for eg Chinese RMB was pegged to US$ from 1994-2005) and finally moving to floating exchange rate system which is based on the demand and supply of the currencies. A currency will tend to become more valuable whenever demand for it is greater than the available supply. It will become less valuable whenever demand is less than available supply (this does not mean people no longer want money, it just means they prefer holding their wealth in some other form, possibly another currency).

Current Account Deficit (CAD) – simply put, it’s the deficit arising on account of the difference between the imports and exports whenever imports exceed exports. The payment of imports is done in convertible currencies such as US$ (the most commonly acceptable one), Euros or UK Pound sterlings while earnings in Exports also are in these currencies. Any deficit on account of CAD, thus, will have to be met from other sources (as we will be discussing it later) and this puts strain on the country to find other avenues

The down-slide of Indian Rupee - Now let’s see the fall in rupee in recent times. Indian Rupee has been highly volatile in the recent past, and has depreciated significantly vis-a-vis USD. Among select Asian currencies, the Indian Rupee has depreciated the highest on a y-o-y analysis, as of August 2013, though most of the Asian peers are also oil importers. 

(Figures are percentage change in a currency vis-à-vis US$)   - source - Exim Bank

 

Phasing out of Quantitative Easing (QE3) by US 

 

Additional supply of US$ in US has a ripple multiplier effect in emerging economies including India. To revive the US economy, the Federal Reserve has been pumping out $85 billion of cash per month (called Quantitative Easing). The fiscal cliff, supposed to be from early 2013, in the US had been deferred, albeit temporarily. As a result, growing investor optimism had translated into ‘risk on’ behaviour, which led to a surge in capital flows to emerging economies. The renewed confidence has also led to ‘great rotation’, with investors shifting money from ‘safe haven’ government securities to equities in search for yield. The change is reflected in the equity market boom in advanced and emerging economies. A risk-on, prompted by new policy initiatives, creates a favourable disposition towards emerging economy investment, leading to surge in FIIs flows. This increases the supply of liquidity in the system due to QE and together with low interest environ and better growth prospects in emerging economies, contributes to increase in capital flows. The additional factors leading to improvement in the investment climate from July, 2012 inter-alia included (i) announcement by European Central Bank President that the euro would be saved at all cost; (ii) proposal to set-up Banking Union in the euro zone; and (iii) launch of permanent European Stability Mechanism. Thus, while trade deficits in India continued to be more than 10% of the GDP and CAD more than 4.5% of GDP in 2012-13 and first half of 2013-14, a welcome feature during 2012-13 post July, has been that this high CAD had been funded by capital inflows arising on account of QE through FIIs. There has however been high dependence on volatile portfolio flows and external commercial borrowings and this makes capital account vulnerable to a 'reversal' and 'sudden stop' of capital, especially in times of stress and resulting “risk-off” behavior.

US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, in June 2013, has put investors on notice that the central bank is prepared to begin phasing out QE3 and will probably taper its $85 billion in monthly bond buying later in 2013 and halt purchases around mid-2014 as long as the world’s largest economy performs in line with Fed projections. With Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke signaling an end to quantitative easing, investors are looking ahead to rising interest rates in the U.S.—and rethinking their willingness to tolerate risky emerging markets. As they do, India’s currency is taking a particularly painful beating.

Emerging markets like India have long enjoyed a slice of this $85 b/month. Not only will fresh flows stop, older flows will reverse to the US, a net turnaround of hundreds of billions as a result of “risk-off” behavior. This storm has knocked the Rupee down almost 25% in two months. It is the first of many storms that will hit not just India but the whole developing world, with every tightening of the money tap by the Fed. The net impact of tightening of QE by the US on a country will depend on its Current Account Deficit (CAD). If a country is a net exporting country (ie it has a current account surplus and it gets US$), it will gain from such a tightening. But if a country has CAD (when imports exceed exports and thus a net outflow of US$, it’s currency stands to depreciate as the relative value of US$ increases). And this is what has happened to Indian Rupee and while the growing CAD is the main reason, the trigger for the sudden drop in the value of Rupee post June 2013 has been phasing out of QE by the US.

In order to asses the gravity of tightening on the Rupee we have to examine the extent & magnitude of the Current Account Deficit (CAD) for India. The trends in exports and imports (in US$ millions) for India is

source: Economic Survey



The Exports and Imports for 2012-13 have been 300,570 and 491,487 million US$ and with a trade balance of US$ 190,197 millions. Of the imports, crude oil imports have been US$ 169,396 millions (about 34% of all imports) and the oil deficit (excess of imports of oil & POL products over its exports) at US$ 109,392 millions is 57% of the total trade deficit. The exports during April-July 2013-14 grew by 1.72% while imports grew by 2.82% widening the trade balance gap. While the capital flows increased during 2011-12, it has tapered off during 2012-13 and the CAD gap thus had to draw from the Foreign exchange reserves.

While the trade deficit has been more than 10% since 2011-12, the CAD @ US$70 Billion or 4.8% of the GDP has been a cause of concern.

Lets now examine the components of Imports and whether something can be done to contain and reduce imports –

While the imports on account of crude oil has been going up, both on account of increasing quantity and also the increasing international prices, what’s cause of concern has been the equally larger share of imports of manufactured products.

Growing manufacturing imports: One of the major reasons for the volatile behaviour of Rupee has been mounting trade deficit triggered by growing manufacturing imports. The trade deficit increased significantly from US$ 119 billion in 2010-11 to US$ 192 billion in 2012-13. Manufactured imports, which increased from US$ 140 billion in 2010-11 to USD 167 billion in 2012-13, accounted for nearly 80% of the trade deficit, and almost double that of India’s current account deficit. This is primarily due to the weak manufacturing sector domestically.  Manufacturing sector performed below the potential due to certain policy aberrations, unfriendly labour and environmental regulations, land allocation policies, and somewhat confusing signals being sent to international investors. This coupled with slowdown factors, as also the overall low business sentiments across the world, have been deterring fresh investments into the economy, which is also reflected in the decline in capital formation in the manufacturing economy. Capital formation in manufacturing has been stagnant for the several decades at below 32% of total GDCF, while the share of capital formation in services sector has grown from 39.3% in 1970 to 51.0% in 2010. Import of high-end manufactured products (capital goods, electronics and chemicals) led to a widening trade deficit. Import of these three product categories amounted to US$ 103.7 bn in 2012-13, accounting for 53.6% of trade deficit, and 118% of CAD. While I can understand the relative inelasticity of demand for crude oil, the growing imports in manufacturing sector certainly are a dangerous pointers to the systemic inefficiencies in domestic manufacturing sector and their increasingly becoming uncompetitive.

The share of gold imports is continuing. While one may question the obsession with the yellow metal, this is considered a safe investment in the absence of a viable safe and growing alternative.

Surplus in Services Trade not Adequate:   The growth in services trade could not compensate for the trade deficit to the full extent. During 2008-09, the surplus in services trade covered nearly 46% of the trade deficit. This coverage has come down to 34% in 2012-13. Software exports that account for around 45 % of the overall services exports have also witnessed a decline in export growth. 

Challenges in the Capital Account : The deficit in current account transactions needs to be compensated with a surplus in capital account to manage the balance of payments, and keep intact the reserve position and thereby stabilisation of home currency. However, the slow down sentiments across the world, and within the domestic economy have catered to decline in capital inflows (both FDI and FII). While FIIs found India less attractive due to slowing down of economy, FDI inflows hampered due to unstable policy. As the capital account could not fully compensate the CAD, there has been decrease in forex reserves both in 2011-12 and 2012-13.

 

Decline in Forex Reserves:  The resultant factor has been the decline in import cover from 10 months in 2010-11 to 7 months in 2012-13, which further has remained at 7 months as of end August 2013.

Deterioration of External Debt Profile:  India’s gross external debt has also increased in the past five years, from US$ 224.5 bn as on March 31, 2009 to US$ 390 bn as on March 31, 2013. Short-term debt as a per cent of total debt has also increased from 19.3 per cent to 24.8 per cent during the same period. The ratio of volatile capital flows (defined to include cumulative portfolio inflows and short term debt – in other terms, hot money) to reserves has also increased in the last six months from 83.9% as at end September 2012 to 96.1% as at end March 2013.  According to RBI estimates, external debt obligations remain large with around $172 billion worth of short-term residual maturity external debt due for redemption by March 2014.

Is oil imports the culprit/only culprit ?

The domestic production of crude oil has miserably failed to keep pace with the growing demand. As a result, the entire share of growing demand has to be necessarily met from the imports. There are two reasons for increase in stress on account of oil imports

a)   Growing imports of the crude oil -The share of domestic production and imports of crude oil is                                                                                                                                               (in Million tonnes)

 

While the growth in domestic production has been a mere 10.7% during this period, the growth in imports has been 45%. The share of domestic production of the overall consumption came down from 26% in 2004-05 to 18% in 2011-12 while that of imports went up from 74% to 82% for the same period.

b). Growing cost of imported oil –  The price of imported crude oil (in US$/bbl) has continuously increased. The trend is

As we can see, the percentage increase for the period 2002-03 till 2012-13 in the total bill on account of oil imports (9.16  times) is more than the actual increase per price of crude oil in US&/BBL (4.19 times)  and that’s because of increasing quantity of crude oil imports too. In a way, it’s double whammy. As per an OECD study (Wurzel et el 2009 – OECD Economics Department working papers No 737), a $10 increase in oil price reduces the activity from second year by 2/10^th of a percent and increases inflation in the first year by 2/10^th of a percent and another 1/10^th in the second year. These multiplier exclude dynamic effects such as downward adjustments in personal savings, toll on potential growth and detrimental effect of price volatility on business investments.

 RUPEE DEPRECIATION AND IMPACT - Though the currency depreciation makes our exports competitive, it highly impacts our import bill also, and thus triggers inflationary trends. Rupee's depreciation has a direct link with escalating non-Plan expenditure, two biggest components of which are interest payments and subsidies. External debt servicing cost in terms of the rupee, due to the latter's depreciation, shoots up, putting a strain on the exchequer. Stock markets have also been in disarray bringing down the overall business sentiments.

THE WAY FORWARD

Though Indian Rupee has become highly volatile due to various market sentiments including the US Fed’s announcement, there are clear issues that are intrinsic to the Indian economy that needs to be addressed soon, primarily aimed at reducing trade deficit.

Short term options: the need to control imports of non-essential manufacturing items is a must at this moment to control outgo on imports. The Finance Minister has announced yesterday (September 7th ) that the Government plans to take some "hard decisions" to trim wasteful expenditure and curb the import of non-essential items to deal with the stressed economic situation. As a prelude, the Government last month slapped a 36% duty on import of flat-screen television by air-travellers. However, these measures should only be temporary and the real answer lies in making the manufacturing sector in India more competitive. Otherwise, it may be seen as return of "permit-Raj".

Government may consider settling trade transactions through local currencies with select countries. Government may also consider currency swap mechanism with select countries to boost the market confidence. Another key element could be the economic pricing of fertilizer (urea) and petro products which would encourage their efficient use and lead to saving of foreign exchange. While the need for a rationale use of POL is unquestionable, the hype created over it in the media is exaggerated.

Long term options: The above measures are only for the short run and would serve only to purchase a breathing space for long-term policy action, which is the only fail-safe measure. These should largely be geared towards creating an enabling environment for attracting investments in the domestic economy, especially to stimulate manufacturing sector, so that the real economy is placed back on track. Some of the suggestions are:

• Central Government, in consultation with State Governments may identify Hi-tech zones / sector specific manufacturing zones, and provision of fiscal and financial incentives and preferential procurement policy that would attract Greenfield FDI.
• Establishment of fast track ‘green channel’ single window clearance mechanism, including environmental clearances for such projects, rule-based clearances, including pre-notified clearances in such identified hi-tech / manufacturing zones, keeping in mind the parameters for Doing Business Index in which India scores relatively less. 
• Provision of uninterrupted power-supplies and other infrastructure facilities in such zones.
• The existing cap on plant and machinery for MSMEs need to be revised upwards so that they move up the value chain, through technology up-gradation and quality compliance.
• Indian firms need to be encouraged to invest in R&D which will position them technologically strong. India, on the lines of being provided in Canada, may consider providing dual tax credit allowances system that rewards both incremental expenses in R&D as well as the level of spending in R&D. Additional tax credits for SME units engaged in R&D activities could also be considered.
• On the lines of concessional financing support provided by Brazil (through BNDES), India may also like to consider encouraging sourcing of locally produced capital goods and ships.
• On the lines of Shipping Funds established by Governments of China and Korea, India may also consider establishing a Shipping Fund, and encourage procurement of ships from domestic ship yards.
• A Special Medium Term Refinance window or TUFS like scheme may be announced for supporting technology development of various manufacturing sectors.
• Labour regulations may be relaxed for such investments; contractual employment arrangements may be permitted with higher average salary package (10-15% higher than normal package) and with higher social security benefits (like PF, gratuity etc).